Is it safe to store data in the cloud?

Cyber-attacks of the current generation have spawned a lively underground economy in which stolen products and unlawful services are purchased and sold in a “professional” way, assuming criminals have any sense of honor. Cybercrime has evolved into distinct “markets” that, when combined, constitute the whole of the criminal supply chain.

As a result, cybercrime is growing at a far quicker pace. All of the instruments are now available for purchase, and even relatively unskilled thieves may rapidly get to work.

Several instances of this specialization include the following:

  • Cybercrime has its own social networking sites that provide escrow services.
  • Malware is now licensable and comes with technical support.
  • You may now hire botnets on an hourly basis for your criminal enterprise.
  • Pay-to-play malware infection services are capable of rapidly establishing botnets.
  • A thriving market for one-of-a-kind adventures (unknown vulnerabilities).

As technology developed, an increasing number of companies began to utilize the cloud’s advantages. Compared to file servers, the cloud enables increased mobility by allowing access to files from any device, anytime, enables collaboration across offices, helps save on storage space, and may help improve control over corporate data. However, many businesses continue to have security concerns when migrating data to the cloud, and the growth of data breaches indicates that hackers are more interested in cloud-based information.

Cloud computing has emerged as a major target for cyberattacks. If you follow cyber news, you’ll note that many of the year’s largest assaults originated in the cloud. There are many causes for this. There are more methods than ever before to disclose company data inadvertently. Meanwhile, workers fail to take the required precautions to safeguard business data. Small companies are particularly vulnerable. They lack advanced security measures and often fail to take the required precautions to avoid a compromise. According to Ponemon Research, only 36% of small company owners have data security procedures in place.

All major cloud storage providers claim their services are secure. There may be a significant practical difference between the two methods of security. Consider the problems Dropbox recently had after an alleged breach of millions of user data through its connection with third-party applications. Google Drive has struggled to maintain user privacy. According to Google’s privacy statement, it is permitted to “use, host, store, reproduce, modify, create derivative works, communicate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display, and distribute (your) content.”

The cloud stores data with a third-party supplier and allows for remote access through the internet. This implies that visibility and control over the data are constrained. Additionally, it begs the issue of how it can be protected effectively. Everyone must know their assigned responsibilities and the inherent security risks associated with cloud computing.

Cloud service providers approach cloud security issues together. In this approach, the cloud service provider is responsible for the cloud’s security, but the client is responsible for the security of the data stored in it. In any cloud service—from Software as a Service (SaaS) offerings such as Microsoft Office 365 to Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) offerings such as Amazon Web Services (AWS)—the cloud computing client is always responsible for securing their data and restricting access to it.

While the majority of companies are only in the second or third generation of protection, today’s assaults are in the fifth generation—and hackers and cyberattacks will only continue to improve in organization, sophistication, and speed. Businesses must have a strategy for migrating from point-solution security to a 5th-generation security infrastructure. 5th-generation security is a form of advanced threat prevention that prevents attacks across an organization’s entire IT infrastructure, including networks, virtual instances, cloud deployments, endpoints, remote offices, and mobile devices, using a single, centralized management console for administration, monitoring, and response. It is not just a foundation that defends against 5th-generation assaults, but also an architecture that enables companies to add security capabilities quickly and effectively as threats develop and IT environments adapt.

5th-generation security is a form of advanced threat prevention that prevents attacks across an organization’s entire IT infrastructure, including networks, virtual instances, cloud deployments, endpoints, remote offices, and mobile devices, using a single, centralized management console for administration, monitoring, and response. It is not just a foundation that defends against 5th-generation threats, but also an architecture that enables companies to add security capabilities quickly and effectively as assaults develop and IT environments adapt.

What does the future hold?

Cloud computing, or the delivery of information technology services over the internet, necessitates a distinct set of security concerns from conventional on-premises security. Historically, corporate security meant enclosing company programs and data behind firewalls and controlling endpoint devices that functioned inside those firewalls—a paradigm dubbed the “walled garden.” However, this paradigm is fundamentally incompatible with cloud computing, which by definition necessitates the movement of data outside of the business boundary. Previously, the emphasis was mainly on malware prevention. However, with both managed and uncontrolled devices sending data to the cloud—and data moving across clouds—security concerns have shifted significantly.

While many continue to think that on-premises data storage is better owing to more control and visibility, there are many fewer breaches on public clouds as a result of cloud security companies’ focus on security as a component of their business models.

Found this useful? Share with